reasoning benchmark
MBPP EvalPlus (base) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems for evaluating LLM-synthesized code with expanded test cases.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score72.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mbpp evalplus (base) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct currently leads MBPP EvalPlus (base) with 72.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MBPP EvalPlus (base) measures and how its scores work.
MBPP EvalPlus (base) is the EvalPlus extension of MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems), a benchmark of 974 Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, for LLM-synthesized code evaluated on the Python programming problems.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MBPP EvalPlus (base).
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is currently ranked first with 72.80%.
The current leaders are Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (72.80%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (2,047.00 tok/s via Cerebras).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio, for LLM-synthesized code evaluated on the Python programming problems.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.