math benchmark
MATH (CoT) is a benchmark based on 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems using Chain-of-Thought prompting to encourage step-by-step reasoning.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelME | Score68.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score67.60% | Percentile80.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMA | Score67.60% | Percentile60.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelMA | Score62.60% | Percentile40.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMA | Score60.10% | Percentile20.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelME | Score51.90% | Percentile0.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What MATH (CoT) measures and how its scores work.
MATH (CoT) is a Chain-of-Thought variant of the MATH dataset, which contains problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions across seven mathematical subjects and difficulty levels 1-5.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MATH (CoT).
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 68.00%.
The current leaders are Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (68.00%), Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) (67.60%), and Mistral Large 3 (67.60%).
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.10 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (2,047.00 tok/s via Cerebras) and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (1,204.00 tok/s via Cerebras).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures Score, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis math (cot) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct currently leads MATH (CoT) with 68.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.