reasoning benchmark
LiveCodeBench(01-09) is a benchmark for evaluating large language models on code using newly collected programming contest problems.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelDE | Score41.80% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis livecodebench(01-09) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
DeepSeek-V2.5 currently leads LiveCodeBench(01-09) with 41.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What LiveCodeBench(01-09) measures and how its scores work.
LiveCodeBench is a contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code, with problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces annotated with release dates.
It evaluates code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about LiveCodeBench(01-09).
DeepSeek-V2.5 is currently ranked first with 41.80%.
The current leaders are DeepSeek-V2.5 (41.80%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V2.5 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It evaluates code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.