llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

LingoQA Leaderboard

LingoQA is a benchmark for multimodal spatial-language understanding and visual-linguistic question answering.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LingoQA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.40%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.00%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore80.80%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore79.20%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

LingoQA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LingoQA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LingoQA

The Top AI Models for LingoQA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LingoQA?

What LingoQA measures and how its scores work.

LingoQA is a language benchmark for multimodal spatial-language understanding and visual-linguistic question answering.

It measures multimodal spatial-language understanding and visual-linguistic question answering using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
LingoQA
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LingoQA.

Which model scores highest on LingoQA?

Qwen3.7-Plus is currently ranked first with 83.40%.

What are the top three models on LingoQA?

The current leaders are Qwen3.7-Plus (83.40%), Qwen3.5-27B (82.00%), and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (80.80%).

Which LingoQA model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LingoQA results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LingoQA measure?

It measures multimodal spatial-language understanding and visual-linguistic question answering using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen3.7-Plus83.40%
Rank #2Qwen3.5-27B82.00%
Rank #3Qwen3.5-122B-A10B80.80%
Rank #4Qwen3.5-35B-A3B79.20%

Ranking basisThis lingoqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    83.40%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LingoQA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    82.00%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LingoQA, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    80.80%
    Price
    $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LingoQA, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    79.20%
    Price
    $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LingoQA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LingoQA

Qwen3.7-Plus currently leads LingoQA with 83.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.7-Plus83.40% · $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3.5-27B82.00% · $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.5-122B-A10B80.80% · $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens