multimodal benchmark
LifeSciBench is an expert-authored and expert-reviewed multimodal benchmark of 750 open-ended life-science research tasks across seven workflows and seven biological domains.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelOP | Score60.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelOP | Score59.90% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelOP | Score56.00% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelOP | Score51.20% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What LifeSciBench measures and how its scores work.
LifeSciBench evaluates responses to open-ended life-science research tasks, many of which require interpreting attached figures, PDFs, and sequence files, using 19,020 physician- and scientist-written rubric criteria.
It measures performance using Score, reported as a ratio, based on grading responses against the rubric criteria rather than multiple-choice answers.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about LifeSciBench.
GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 60.30%.
The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (60.30%), GPT-5.6 Sol (59.90%), and GPT-5.6 Terra (56.00%).
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-5.6 Luna (41.87 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-6 Astra (30.66 tok/s via OpenAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance using Score, reported as a ratio, based on grading responses against the rubric criteria rather than multiple-choice answers.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis lifescibench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
GPT-6 Astra currently leads LifeSciBench with 60.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.