legal benchmark
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) is Harvey's open-source benchmark for evaluating AI agents on complex, long-horizon legal work.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score13.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAN | Score11.70% | Percentile91.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Score7.10% | Percentile83.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Score5.80% | Percentile75.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAN | Score5.40% | Percentile66.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAN | Score4.20% | Percentile58.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelOP | Score2.10% | Percentile50.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelGO | Score0.80% | Percentile41.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelOP | Score0.40% | Percentile33.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelGO | Score0.00% | Percentile25.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Score0.00% | Percentile16.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelGO | Score0.00% | Percentile8.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelOP | Score0.00% | Percentile0.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Legal Agent Benchmark measures and how its scores work.
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on complex, long-horizon legal work.
LAB reports a Score as a ratio using an all-pass standard against expert-curated rubrics; a task passes only if every required criterion for facts, conclusions, citations, structure, and analytical moves passes.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Legal Agent Benchmark.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 13.30%.
The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (13.30%), Claude Opus 5 (11.70%), and Claude Opus 4.7 (7.10%).
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Gemini 3.5 Flash (210.94 tok/s via Google), GPT-5.5 (134.94 tok/s via OpenAI), and Gemini 3 Flash (124.32 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
LAB reports a Score as a ratio using an all-pass standard against expert-curated rubrics; a task passes only if every required criterion for facts, conclusions, citations, structure, and analytical moves passes.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis legal agent benchmark AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Fable 5 currently leads Legal Agent Benchmark with 13.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.