science benchmark
LatchBio SingleCellBench evaluates analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data across several types of problems.
Updated Sep 24, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score61.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis latchbio singlecellbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Opus 5.5 currently leads LatchBio SingleCellBench with 61.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What LatchBio SingleCellBench measures and how its scores work.
LatchBio SingleCellBench is a benchmark for analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data.
It covers cell type labeling, finding differentially expressed genes, and correcting batch effects.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about LatchBio SingleCellBench.
Claude Opus 5.5 is currently ranked first with 61.20%.
The current leaders are Claude Opus 5.5 (61.20%).
Claude Opus 5.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Claude Opus 5.5 (64.14 tok/s via Anthropic).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It covers cell type labeling, finding differentially expressed genes, and correcting batch effects.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.