llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1425 models809 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

science benchmark

LatchBio SingleCellBench Leaderboard

LatchBio SingleCellBench evaluates analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data across several types of problems.

Updated Nov 11, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

LatchBio SingleCellBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Mythos 5.2AnthropicScore65.60%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicScore61.20%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicScore59.10%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicScore56.20%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026

LatchBio SingleCellBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

LatchBio SingleCellBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

LatchBio SingleCellBench

The Top AI Models for LatchBio SingleCellBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is LatchBio SingleCellBench?

What LatchBio SingleCellBench measures and how its scores work.

LatchBio SingleCellBench is a benchmark for analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data.

It covers cell type labeling, finding differentially expressed genes, and correcting batch effects.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
LatchBio SingleCellBench
Modality
text
Primary category
science
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about LatchBio SingleCellBench.

Which model scores highest on LatchBio SingleCellBench?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is currently ranked first with 65.60%.

What are the top three models on LatchBio SingleCellBench?

The current leaders are Claude Mythos 5.2 (65.60%), Claude Opus 5.5 (61.20%), and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (59.10%).

Which LatchBio SingleCellBench model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among LatchBio SingleCellBench results?

The fastest matched records are Claude Sonnet 5.5 (42.00 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does LatchBio SingleCellBench measure?

It covers cell type labeling, finding differentially expressed genes, and correcting batch effects.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Mythos 5.265.60%
Rank #2Claude Opus 5.561.20%
Rank #3Claude Sonnet 5.559.10%
Rank #4Claude Haiku 5.556.20%

Ranking basisThis latchbio singlecellbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Mythos 5.2Anthropic
    Score
    65.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LatchBio SingleCellBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    61.20%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LatchBio SingleCellBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    59.10%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LatchBio SingleCellBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    56.20%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures LatchBio SingleCellBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for LatchBio SingleCellBench

Claude Mythos 5.2 currently leads LatchBio SingleCellBench with 65.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5
Benchmark rank #1Claude Mythos 5.265.60%
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 5.561.20% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Sonnet 5.559.10% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens