agents benchmark
Kernel Bench L3 evaluates agentic GPU kernel optimization across 50 problems.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score96.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis kernel bench l3 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3.7 Max currently leads Kernel Bench L3 with 96.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What Kernel Bench L3 measures and how its scores work.
Kernel Bench L3 is a benchmark for agentic GPU kernel optimization across 50 problems.
It measures median per-problem speedup over the PyTorch eager reference and the fraction of problems faster than torch.compile.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Kernel Bench L3.
Qwen3.7 Max is currently ranked first with 96.00%.
The current leaders are Qwen3.7 Max (96.00%).
Qwen3.7 Max has the lowest matched official input price at $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures median per-problem speedup over the PyTorch eager reference and the fraction of problems faster than torch.compile.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.