multimodal benchmark
ImageMining evaluates multimodal models on extracting structured information from images using tool use.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelZA | Score30.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis imagemining AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
GLM-5V-Turbo currently leads ImageMining with 30.70%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What ImageMining measures and how its scores work.
ImageMining is a multimodal benchmark for extracting structured information from images using tool use.
It measures the ability to combine visual understanding with tool-based retrieval and analysis, using the Score metric with a ratio unit.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about ImageMining.
GLM-5V-Turbo is currently ranked first with 30.70%.
The current leaders are GLM-5V-Turbo (30.70%).
GLM-5V-Turbo has the lowest matched official input price at $5.0 input / $22 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures the ability to combine visual understanding with tool-based retrieval and analysis, using the Score metric with a ratio unit.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.