llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

HumanEval Plus Leaderboard

HumanEval Plus is an enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using the EvalPlus framework.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

HumanEval Plus Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 row
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAMistral Small 3.2 24B InstructMistral AIScore92.90%Percentile100.00%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

HumanEval Plus Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct92.90%

The Top AI Models for HumanEval Plus

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis humaneval plus AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Mistral AI
    Score
    92.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HumanEval Plus, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for HumanEval Plus

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct currently leads HumanEval Plus with 92.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

What is HumanEval Plus?

What HumanEval Plus measures and how its scores work.

HumanEval Plus is a benchmark for evaluating LLM-synthesized code using extended HumanEval test cases.

It measures the functional correctness of LLM-synthesized code and detects previously undetected wrong code.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
HumanEval Plus
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about HumanEval Plus.

Which model scores highest on HumanEval Plus?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is currently ranked first with 92.90%.

What are the top three models on HumanEval Plus?

The current leaders are Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (92.90%).

Which HumanEval Plus model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among HumanEval Plus results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does HumanEval Plus measure?

It measures the functional correctness of LLM-synthesized code and detects previously undetected wrong code.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct92.90%