llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

HumanEval-Mul Leaderboard

HumanEval-Mul is a multilingual variant of the HumanEval benchmark consisting of 164 original programming problems.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

HumanEval-Mul Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelDEDeepSeek-V3DeepSeekScore82.60%Percentile100.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelDEDeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeekScore73.80%Percentile0.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

HumanEval-Mul Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1DeepSeek-V382.60%Rank #2DeepSeek-V2.573.80%

HumanEval-Mul Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

HumanEval-Mul

The Top AI Models for HumanEval-Mul

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is HumanEval-Mul?

What HumanEval-Mul measures and how its scores work.

HumanEval-Mul is a benchmark for synthesizing programs from docstrings.

It measures functional correctness, language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics, with Score reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
HumanEval-Mul
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about HumanEval-Mul.

Which model scores highest on HumanEval-Mul?

DeepSeek-V3 is currently ranked first with 82.60%.

What are the top three models on HumanEval-Mul?

The current leaders are DeepSeek-V3 (82.60%) and DeepSeek-V2.5 (73.80%).

Which HumanEval-Mul model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among HumanEval-Mul results?

The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V3 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek) and DeepSeek-V2.5 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does HumanEval-Mul measure?

It measures functional correctness, language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics, with Score reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Ranking basisThis humaneval-mul AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    DE
    DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek
    Score
    82.60%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HumanEval-Mul, not total model capability
  2. 02
    DE
    DeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeek
    Score
    73.80%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HumanEval-Mul, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for HumanEval-Mul

DeepSeek-V3 currently leads HumanEval-Mul with 82.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1DeepSeek-V382.60% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek
Benchmark rank #2DeepSeek-V2.573.80% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek