healthcare benchmark
HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score66.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelOP | Score63.40% | Percentile88.89% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelOP | Score60.50% | Percentile77.78% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAN | Score59.80% | Percentile66.67% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAN | Score57.80% | Percentile55.56% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelOP | Score57.70% | Percentile44.44% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAN | Score55.80% | Percentile33.33% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelOP | Score55.70% | Percentile22.22% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelOP | Score38.40% | Percentile11.11% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelMI | Score35.00% | Percentile0.00% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What HealthBench Professional measures and how its scores work.
HealthBench Professional is a healthcare benchmark for evaluating models in clinician use cases.
It measures model capability and safety using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about HealthBench Professional.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 66.00%.
The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (66.00%), GPT-6 Astra (63.40%), and GPT-5.6 Sol (60.50%).
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), and Claude Opus 5 (62.88 tok/s via Anthropic).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures model capability and safety using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
10 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis healthbench professional AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Fable 5 currently leads HealthBench Professional with 66.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.