llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

healthcare benchmark

HealthBench Professional Leaderboard

HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models10
Model coverage10
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

HealthBench Professional Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

10 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore66.00%Percentile100.00%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIScore63.40%Percentile88.89%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore60.50%Percentile77.78%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicScore59.80%Percentile66.67%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore57.80%Percentile55.56%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore57.70%Percentile44.44%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore55.80%Percentile33.33%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore55.70%Percentile22.22%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIScore38.40%Percentile11.11%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelMIMAI-Thinking-1MicrosoftScore35.00%Percentile0.00%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

HealthBench Professional Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

HealthBench Professional Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

HealthBench Professional

The Top AI Models for HealthBench Professional

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is HealthBench Professional?

What HealthBench Professional measures and how its scores work.

HealthBench Professional is a healthcare benchmark for evaluating models in clinician use cases.

It measures model capability and safety using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
HealthBench Professional
Modality
text
Primary category
healthcare
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about HealthBench Professional.

Which model scores highest on HealthBench Professional?

Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 66.00%.

What are the top three models on HealthBench Professional?

The current leaders are Claude Fable 5 (66.00%), GPT-6 Astra (63.40%), and GPT-5.6 Sol (60.50%).

Which HealthBench Professional model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among HealthBench Professional results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), and Claude Opus 5 (62.88 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does HealthBench Professional measure?

It measures model capability and safety using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

10 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Fable 566.00%
Rank #2GPT-6 Astra63.40%
Rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol60.50%
Rank #4Claude Opus 559.80%

Ranking basisThis healthbench professional AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Score
    66.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 10 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Score
    63.40%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 30.66 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 10 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    60.50%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 10 compared models
    • 78th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    59.80%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 62.88 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 10 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    57.80%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 10 compared models
    • 56th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for HealthBench Professional

Claude Fable 5 currently leads HealthBench Professional with 66.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.6 Sol
Claude Opus 5
Claude Sonnet 5
Benchmark rank #1Claude Fable 566.00% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-6 Astra63.40% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol60.50% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens