llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1367 models808 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

healthcare benchmark

HealthBench Hard Leaderboard

HealthBench Hard is a challenging variation of HealthBench that evaluates large language models in healthcare using 5,000 multi-turn conversations and evaluation criteria validated by 262 physicians from 60 countries.

Updated Oct 23, 2026

Models11
Model coverage11
MetricScore
EvidenceC

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

HealthBench Hard Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

11 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse SparkMetaScore42.80%Percentile100.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIScore36.20%Percentile90.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore33.10%Percentile80.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore32.70%Percentile70.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore32.00%Percentile60.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT OSS 120BOpenAIScore30.00%Percentile50.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank07ModelOPGPT-5.3 ChatOpenAIScore25.90%Percentile40.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIScore22.90%Percentile30.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank09ModelBYSeed 2.0 MiniByteDanceScore15.30%Percentile20.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank10ModelOPGPT OSS 20BOpenAIScore10.80%Percentile10.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore1.60%Percentile0.00%Participants11EvidenceCEvaluatedOct 22, 2026

HealthBench Hard Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

HealthBench Hard Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

HealthBench Hard

The Top AI Models for HealthBench Hard

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is HealthBench Hard?

What HealthBench Hard measures and how its scores work.

HealthBench Hard is a healthcare benchmark for evaluating large language models through 5,000 multi-turn conversations.

It measures large language models' performance and safety in healthcare using a Score reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.

Family
HealthBench Hard
Modality
text
Primary category
healthcare
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about HealthBench Hard.

Which model scores highest on HealthBench Hard?

Muse Spark is currently ranked first with 42.80%.

What are the top three models on HealthBench Hard?

The current leaders are Muse Spark (42.80%), GPT-6.1 Sol (36.20%), and GPT-5.6 Sol (33.10%).

Which HealthBench Hard model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among HealthBench Hard results?

The fastest matched records are GPT OSS 20B (1,000.00 tok/s via Groq), GPT OSS 120B (500.00 tok/s via Groq), and GPT-5.6 Luna (215.52 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does HealthBench Hard measure?

It measures large language models' performance and safety in healthcare using a Score reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

11 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Muse Spark42.80%
Rank #2GPT-6.1 Sol36.20%
Rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol33.10%
Rank #4GPT-5.6 Terra32.70%

Ranking basisThis healthbench hard AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse SparkMeta
    Score
    42.80%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 11 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Hard, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    Score
    36.20%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 11 compared models
    • 90th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Hard, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    33.10%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 25.46 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 11 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Hard, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    32.70%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 11 compared models
    • 70th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Hard, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    32.00%
    Price
    $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 215.52 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 11 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Hard, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for HealthBench Hard

Muse Spark currently leads HealthBench Hard with 42.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Luna
Benchmark rank #1Muse Spark42.80%
Benchmark rank #2GPT-6.1 Sol36.20% · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol33.10% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens