healthcare benchmark
HealthBench is an open-source benchmark for measuring the performance and safety of large language models in healthcare.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score60.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score58.00% | Percentile87.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelOP | Score57.60% | Percentile75.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelOP | Score57.00% | Percentile62.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelOP | Score57.00% | Percentile50.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelOP | Score55.80% | Percentile37.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelOP | Score54.10% | Percentile25.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelOP | Score51.40% | Percentile12.50% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelOP | Score42.50% | Percentile0.00% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What HealthBench measures and how its scores work.
HealthBench consists of 5,000 multi-turn conversations evaluated by 262 physicians using 48,562 unique rubric criteria across health contexts and behavioral dimensions.
HealthBench measures large language model performance and safety in healthcare, reported as a Score ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about HealthBench.
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 60.20%.
The current leaders are Qwen3.8 Max (60.20%), Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 (58.00%), and GPT OSS 120B (57.60%).
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT OSS 20B (1,000.00 tok/s via Groq), GPT OSS 120B (500.00 tok/s via Groq), and GPT-5.5 Instant (206.89 tok/s via OpenAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
HealthBench measures large language model performance and safety in healthcare, reported as a Score ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis healthbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3.8 Max currently leads HealthBench with 60.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.