knowledge benchmark
Harvey LAB (Vals) evaluates AI systems on complex law-firm style tasks and is reported by Vals.
Updated Oct 23, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXA | Score19.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelXA | Score15.80% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Harvey LAB (Vals) measures and how its scores work.
Harvey LAB (Vals) is a professional legal-work evaluation of AI systems on complex law-firm style tasks.
It reports a Score measured as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Harvey LAB (Vals).
Grok 4.7 is currently ranked first with 19.60%.
The current leaders are Grok 4.7 (19.60%) and Grok 4.6 (15.80%).
Grok 4.7 has the lowest matched official input price at $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It reports a Score measured as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis harvey lab (vals) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Grok 4.7 currently leads Harvey LAB (Vals) with 19.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.