reasoning benchmark
FullStackBench zh Leaderboard
FullStackBench zh is the Chinese subset of FullStackBench for evaluating end-to-end software engineering and full-stack development capability.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB
FullStackBench zh Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score58.70% | Percentile100.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score57.40% | Percentile50.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score55.00% | Percentile0.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
FullStackBench zh Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
FullStackBench zh Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for FullStackBench zh
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What is FullStackBench zh?
What FullStackBench zh measures and how its scores work.
FullStackBench zh is a Chinese subset of FullStackBench.
It evaluates end-to-end software engineering and full-stack development capability using the Score metric, expressed as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- FullStackBench zh
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- overall
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about FullStackBench zh.
Which model scores highest on FullStackBench zh?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is currently ranked first with 58.70%.
What are the top three models on FullStackBench zh?
The current leaders are Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (58.70%), Qwen3.5-27B (57.40%), and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (55.00%).
Which FullStackBench zh model has the lowest official input price?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens.
Which models are fastest among FullStackBench zh results?
No matched runtime record is currently available.
Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.