llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1425 models809 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

FrontierCode 2.0 Leaderboard

FrontierCode 2.0 is Cognition's private benchmark for assessing the end-to-end code quality of coding-agent changes.

Updated Nov 11, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

FrontierCode 2.0 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Fable 5.2AnthropicScore49.10%Percentile100.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank02ModelMAMistral Large 4Mistral AIScore19.70%Percentile0.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026

FrontierCode 2.0 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Fable 5.249.10%Rank #2Mistral Large 419.70%

FrontierCode 2.0 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

FrontierCode 2.0

The Top AI Models for FrontierCode 2.0

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is FrontierCode 2.0?

What FrontierCode 2.0 measures and how its scores work.

FrontierCode 2.0 is a private benchmark assessing coding-agent changes.

It measures the end-to-end code quality of coding-agent changes, including whether a repository maintainer would merge the change.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
FrontierCode 2.0
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about FrontierCode 2.0.

Which model scores highest on FrontierCode 2.0?

Claude Fable 5.2 is currently ranked first with 49.10%.

What are the top three models on FrontierCode 2.0?

The current leaders are Claude Fable 5.2 (49.10%) and Mistral Large 4 (19.70%).

Which FrontierCode 2.0 model has the lowest official input price?

Mistral Large 4 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.70 input / $2.1 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among FrontierCode 2.0 results?

The fastest matched records are Mistral Large 4 (50.35 tok/s via Mistral AI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does FrontierCode 2.0 measure?

It measures the end-to-end code quality of coding-agent changes, including whether a repository maintainer would merge the change.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Ranking basisThis frontiercode 2.0 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic
    Score
    49.10%
    Price
    $8.0 input / $40 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FrontierCode 2.0, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
    Score
    19.70%
    Price
    $0.70 input / $2.1 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 50.35 tok/s via Mistral AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FrontierCode 2.0, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for FrontierCode 2.0

Claude Fable 5.2 currently leads FrontierCode 2.0 with 49.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Claude Fable 5.249.10% · $8.0 input / $40 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Mistral Large 419.70% · $0.70 input / $2.1 output per 1M tokens