reasoning benchmark
FrontierCode 2.0 is Cognition's private benchmark for assessing the end-to-end code quality of coding-agent changes.
Updated Nov 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score49.10% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score19.70% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What FrontierCode 2.0 measures and how its scores work.
FrontierCode 2.0 is a private benchmark assessing coding-agent changes.
It measures the end-to-end code quality of coding-agent changes, including whether a repository maintainer would merge the change.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FrontierCode 2.0.
Claude Fable 5.2 is currently ranked first with 49.10%.
The current leaders are Claude Fable 5.2 (49.10%) and Mistral Large 4 (19.70%).
Mistral Large 4 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.70 input / $2.1 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Mistral Large 4 (50.35 tok/s via Mistral AI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures the end-to-end code quality of coding-agent changes, including whether a repository maintainer would merge the change.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis frontiercode 2.0 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Fable 5.2 currently leads FrontierCode 2.0 with 49.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.