agents benchmark
FrontierSWE (Impl.) Leaderboard
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricRank
EvidenceB
FrontierSWE (Impl.) Ranking
Lower rank ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Rank | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXI | Rank3.40 rank | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
FrontierSWE (Impl.) Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for FrontierSWE (Impl.)
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis frontierswe (impl.) AI model leaderboard uses ascending rank in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
- 01XIXiaomi
- Rank
- 3.40 rank
- Price
- $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 5.27 tok/s via DeepInfra
Strengths
- Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
- 100th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures FrontierSWE (Impl.), not total model capability
Selection summary
Best AI Models for FrontierSWE (Impl.)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro currently leads FrontierSWE (Impl.) with 3.40 rank. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What is FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
What FrontierSWE (Impl.) measures and how its scores work.
FrontierSWE (Impl.) is a benchmark for software engineering implementation ability.
It measures performance on implementation tasks using Rank, where lower rank is better.
Scores are shown in rank. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- FrontierSWE (Impl.)
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- agents
- Score direction
- lower
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- overall
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about FrontierSWE (Impl.).
Which model scores highest on FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 3.40 rank.
What are the top three models on FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
The current leaders are MiMo-V2.5-Pro (3.40 rank).
Which FrontierSWE (Impl.) model has the lowest official input price?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lowest matched official input price at $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens.
Which models are fastest among FrontierSWE (Impl.) results?
The fastest matched records are MiMo-V2.5-Pro (5.27 tok/s via DeepInfra).
Does the highest rank result prove overall model quality?
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.