llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

FLEURS Leaderboard

FLEURS is a parallel speech dataset in 102 languages built on FLoRes-101, with approximately 12 hours of speech supervision per language.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

FLEURS Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore95.90%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 1.0 ProGoogleScore93.60%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceBEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelGOGemini 1.5 ProGoogleScore93.30%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemma 4 12BGoogleScore93.10%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemini 1.5 FlashGoogleScore90.40%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGoogleScore86.40%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

FLEURS Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

FLEURS Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

FLEURS

The Top AI Models for FLEURS

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is FLEURS?

What FLEURS measures and how its scores work.

FLEURS stands for Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech and is a parallel speech dataset for tasks including ASR, speech language identification, translation and retrieval.

It measures speech recognition accuracy, calculated as 1 - word error rate, with higher scores being better.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
FLEURS
Modality
audio
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about FLEURS.

Which model scores highest on FLEURS?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is currently ranked first with 95.90%.

What are the top three models on FLEURS?

The current leaders are Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (95.90%), Gemini 1.0 Pro (93.60%), and Gemini 1.5 Pro (93.30%).

Which FLEURS model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among FLEURS results?

The fastest matched records are Gemini 1.5 Flash (150.00 tok/s via Google), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (150.00 tok/s via Google), and Gemini 1.0 Pro (120.00 tok/s via Google).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does FLEURS measure?

It measures speech recognition accuracy, calculated as 1 - word error rate, with higher scores being better.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen2.5-Omni-7B95.90%
Rank #2Gemini 1.0 Pro93.60%
Rank #3Gemini 1.5 Pro93.30%
Rank #4Gemma 4 12B93.10%

Ranking basisThis fleurs AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    95.90%
    Price
    $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FLEURS, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 1.0 ProGoogle
    Score
    93.60%
    Speed
    Up to 120.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FLEURS, not total model capability
  3. 03
    GO
    Google
    Score
    93.30%
    Speed
    Up to 85.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FLEURS, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Google
    Score
    93.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FLEURS, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    Score
    90.40%
    Speed
    Up to 150.00 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures FLEURS, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for FLEURS

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B currently leads FLEURS with 95.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Gemini 1.5 Pro
Gemma 4 12B
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Benchmark rank #1Qwen2.5-Omni-7B95.90% · $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Gemini 1.0 Pro93.60% · Up to 120.00 tok/s via Google
Benchmark rank #3Gemini 1.5 Pro93.30% · Up to 85.00 tok/s via Google