language benchmark
FLEURS is a parallel speech dataset in 102 languages built on FLoRes-101, with approximately 12 hours of speech supervision per language.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score95.90% | Percentile100.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score93.60% | Percentile80.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceB | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Score93.30% | Percentile60.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Score93.10% | Percentile40.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelGO | Score90.40% | Percentile20.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelGO | Score86.40% | Percentile0.00% | Participants6 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What FLEURS measures and how its scores work.
FLEURS stands for Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech and is a parallel speech dataset for tasks including ASR, speech language identification, translation and retrieval.
It measures speech recognition accuracy, calculated as 1 - word error rate, with higher scores being better.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FLEURS.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is currently ranked first with 95.90%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (95.90%), Gemini 1.0 Pro (93.60%), and Gemini 1.5 Pro (93.30%).
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Gemini 1.5 Flash (150.00 tok/s via Google), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (150.00 tok/s via Google), and Gemini 1.0 Pro (120.00 tok/s via Google).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures speech recognition accuracy, calculated as 1 - word error rate, with higher scores being better.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis fleurs AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B currently leads FLEURS with 95.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.