llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

safety benchmark

ExploitGym Leaderboard

ExploitGym is a benchmark based on real-world vulnerabilities in userspace programs, Google's V8 engine, and the Linux kernel, in which agents craft end-to-end exploits for unauthorized code execution.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ExploitGym Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIScore42.40%Percentile100.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore33.70%Percentile75.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore23.20%Percentile50.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIScore15.00%Percentile25.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore12.40%Percentile0.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

ExploitGym Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

ExploitGym Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ExploitGym

The Top AI Models for ExploitGym

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is ExploitGym?

What ExploitGym measures and how its scores work.

ExploitGym is a safety benchmark that provides a vulnerability and a proof-of-vulnerability input and requires agents to create a working end-to-end exploit.

It measures performance using Score, reported as a ratio, for achieving unauthorized code execution.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ExploitGym
Modality
text
Primary category
safety
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ExploitGym.

Which model scores highest on ExploitGym?

GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 42.40%.

What are the top three models on ExploitGym?

The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (42.40%), GPT-5.6 Sol (33.70%), and GPT-5.6 Terra (23.20%).

Which ExploitGym model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among ExploitGym results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-5.6 Luna (41.87 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does ExploitGym measure?

It measures performance using Score, reported as a ratio, for achieving unauthorized code execution.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6 Astra42.40%
Rank #2GPT-5.6 Sol33.70%
Rank #3GPT-5.6 Terra23.20%
Rank #4GLM-5.315.00%

Ranking basisThis exploitgym AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Score
    42.40%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 30.66 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitGym, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Score
    33.70%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitGym, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    23.20%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 99.35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitGym, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    15.00%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitGym, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    12.40%
    Price
    $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 41.87 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitGym, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ExploitGym

GPT-6 Astra currently leads ExploitGym with 42.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.6 Terra
GLM-5.3
GPT-5.6 Luna
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6 Astra42.40% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-5.6 Sol33.70% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Terra23.20% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens