llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

safety benchmark

ExploitBench Leaderboard

ExploitBench is a cybersecurity benchmark that evaluates a model's ability to discover and exploit software vulnerabilities.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ExploitBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-6 AstraOpenAIScore100.00%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore78.00%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore73.50%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIScore54.40%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore52.90%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore33.20%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

ExploitBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

ExploitBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ExploitBench

The Top AI Models for ExploitBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is ExploitBench?

What ExploitBench measures and how its scores work.

ExploitBench is a cybersecurity benchmark.

It measures the fraction of challenges where the model captures the target (Cap%).

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ExploitBench
Modality
text
Primary category
safety
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ExploitBench.

Which model scores highest on ExploitBench?

GPT-6 Astra is currently ranked first with 100.00%.

What are the top three models on ExploitBench?

The current leaders are GPT-6 Astra (100.00%), Claude Fable 5 (78.00%), and GPT-5.6 Sol (73.50%).

Which ExploitBench model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lowest matched official input price at $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among ExploitBench results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.3 (472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI), GPT-5.6 Terra (99.35 tok/s via OpenAI), and Claude Fable 5 (43.18 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does ExploitBench measure?

It measures the fraction of challenges where the model captures the target (Cap%).

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-6 Astra100.00%
Rank #2Claude Fable 578.00%
Rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol73.50%
Rank #4GLM-5.354.40%

Ranking basisThis exploitbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    Score
    100.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 30.66 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Score
    78.00%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 43.18 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    73.50%
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 2.36 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ZA
    Zhipu AI
    Score
    54.40%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 472.69 tok/s via FriendliAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    52.90%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 99.35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ExploitBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ExploitBench

GPT-6 Astra currently leads ExploitBench with 100.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.6 Sol
GLM-5.3
GPT-5.6 Terra
Benchmark rank #1GPT-6 Astra100.00% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Fable 578.00% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol73.50% · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens