reasoning benchmark
EvalPlus is a code synthesis evaluation framework that augments existing datasets with test cases generated by LLM and mutation-based strategies, including HumanEval+ with 80x more test cases.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score0.80 points | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score0.79 points | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score0.78 points | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score0.70 points | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What EvalPlus measures and how its scores work.
EvalPlus is a code synthesis evaluation framework that extends existing datasets with additional test cases.
It measures the functional correctness of generated code using Score, reported in points.
Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about EvalPlus.
Kimi K2 Base is currently ranked first with 0.80 points.
The current leaders are Kimi K2 Base (0.80 points), Qwen2 72B Instruct (0.79 points), and Qwen3 235B A22B (0.78 points).
Qwen3 235B A22B has the lowest matched official input price at $0.70 input / $2.8 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Qwen3 235B A22B (21.74 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures the functional correctness of generated code using Score, reported in points.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis evalplus AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Kimi K2 Base currently leads EvalPlus with 0.80 points. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.