llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

DSBench-Hard Leaderboard

DSBench-Hard is DeepSeek's internal test set of difficult coding-agent problems.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

DSBench-Hard Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeekScore67.20%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeekScore63.60%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731DeepSeekScore59.60%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

DSBench-Hard Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

DSBench-Hard Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

DSBench-Hard

The Top AI Models for DSBench-Hard

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is DSBench-Hard?

What DSBench-Hard measures and how its scores work.

DSBench-Hard is a benchmark in the agents category consisting of DeepSeek's internal test set of difficult coding-agent problems.

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on difficult coding-agent problems.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
DSBench-Hard
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about DSBench-Hard.

Which model scores highest on DSBench-Hard?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is currently ranked first with 67.20%.

What are the top three models on DSBench-Hard?

The current leaders are DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (67.20%), DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp (63.60%), and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (59.60%).

Which DSBench-Hard model has the lowest official input price?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among DSBench-Hard results?

The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (45.48 tok/s via DeepSeek), DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp (15.91 tok/s via DeepInfra), and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (15.91 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does DSBench-Hard measure?

It measures Score, reported as a ratio, on difficult coding-agent problems.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1DeepSeek-V4-Pro-081367.20%
Rank #2DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp63.60%
Rank #3DeepSeek-V4-Flash-073159.60%

Ranking basisThis dsbench-hard AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    DE
    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek
    Score
    67.20%
    Speed
    Up to 45.48 tok/s via DeepSeek

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DSBench-Hard, not total model capability
  2. 02
    DE
    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek
    Score
    63.60%
    Price
    $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 15.91 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DSBench-Hard, not total model capability
  3. 03
    DE
    DeepSeek
    Score
    59.60%
    Price
    $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 15.91 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DSBench-Hard, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for DSBench-Hard

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 currently leads DSBench-Hard with 67.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Benchmark rank #1DeepSeek-V4-Pro-081367.20% · Up to 45.48 tok/s via DeepSeek
Benchmark rank #2DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp63.60% · $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3DeepSeek-V4-Flash-073159.60% · $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens