reasoning benchmark
DRACO is a deep research benchmark for evaluating an agent's ability to gather, synthesize, and reason over information to answer complex research questions.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelTE | Score77.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMI | Score73.23% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What DRACO measures and how its scores work.
DRACO is a deep research benchmark in the reasoning category.
It measures an agent's ability to gather, synthesize, and reason over information to answer complex research questions, using the Score metric reported as a ratio based on the average of official rubric scores across all questions.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about DRACO.
Hy4 preview is currently ranked first with 77.20%.
The current leaders are Hy4 preview (77.20%) and MiniMax M3 (73.23%).
MiniMax M3 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are MiniMax M3 (6.61 tok/s via MiniMax).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures an agent's ability to gather, synthesize, and reason over information to answer complex research questions, using the Score metric reported as a ratio based on the average of official rubric scores across all questions.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis draco AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Hy4 preview currently leads DRACO with 77.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.