llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

DeepSearchQA Leaderboard

DeepSearchQA is a benchmark for evaluating deep search and question-answering capabilities across complex knowledge domains.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models10
Model coverage10
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

DeepSearchQA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

10 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore95.00%Percentile100.00%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore93.10%Percentile88.89%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore91.30%Percentile77.78%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTEHy3TencentScore91.00%Percentile66.67%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelMEMuse Spark 1.3MetaScore89.40%Percentile55.56%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelXIMiMo-V2-ProXiaomiScore86.70%Percentile44.44%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore83.00%Percentile33.33%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore77.10%Percentile22.22%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank09ModelMEMuse SparkMetaScore74.80%Percentile11.11%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank10ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore74.60%Percentile0.00%Participants10EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

DeepSearchQA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

DeepSearchQA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

DeepSearchQA

The Top AI Models for DeepSearchQA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is DeepSearchQA?

What DeepSearchQA measures and how its scores work.

DeepSearchQA is a reasoning benchmark for evaluating deep search and question-answering capabilities.

It measures models' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and information retrieval across complex knowledge domains, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
DeepSearchQA
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSearchQA.

Which model scores highest on DeepSearchQA?

Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 95.00%.

What are the top three models on DeepSearchQA?

The current leaders are Kimi K3 (95.00%), Claude Opus 4.8 (93.10%), and Claude Opus 4.6 (91.30%).

Which DeepSearchQA model has the lowest official input price?

MiMo-V2-Pro has the lowest matched official input price at $0.44 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among DeepSearchQA results?

The fastest matched records are Claude Opus 4.6 (123.15 tok/s via Anthropic), Claude Opus 4.8 (42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI), and Muse Spark 1.3 (8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does DeepSearchQA measure?

It measures models' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and information retrieval across complex knowledge domains, using the Score metric as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

10 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Kimi K395.00%
Rank #2Claude Opus 4.893.10%
Rank #3Claude Opus 4.691.30%
Rank #4Hy391.00%

Ranking basisThis deepsearchqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    95.00%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 10 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSearchQA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
    Score
    93.10%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Vertex AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 10 compared models
    • 89th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSearchQA, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    91.30%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 123.15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 10 compared models
    • 78th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSearchQA, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TE
    Tencent
    Score
    91.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 10 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSearchQA, not total model capability
  5. 05
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    89.40%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 8.44 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 10 compared models
    • 56th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures DeepSearchQA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for DeepSearchQA

Kimi K3 currently leads DeepSearchQA with 95.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Opus 4.6
Hy3
Muse Spark 1.3
Benchmark rank #1Kimi K395.00% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Opus 4.893.10% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Opus 4.691.30% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens