productivity benchmark
DECK-Bench is Moonshot AI's internal evaluation of agents creating and reasoning over presentation-style knowledge-work artifacts.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score73.50% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis deck-bench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Kimi K3 currently leads DECK-Bench with 73.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What DECK-Bench measures and how its scores work.
DECK-Bench is an internal benchmark from Moonshot AI for evaluating agents on presentation-style knowledge-work artifacts.
It measures agents' ability to create and reason over presentation-style knowledge-work artifacts, reported as a Score in ratio units.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about DECK-Bench.
Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 73.50%.
The current leaders are Kimi K3 (73.50%).
Kimi K3 has the lowest matched official input price at $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures agents' ability to create and reason over presentation-style knowledge-work artifacts, reported as a Score in ratio units.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.