reasoning benchmark
CruxEval-O is the output prediction task of the CRUXEval benchmark, consisting of 800 Python functions of 3–13 lines where models predict the output for a given function and input.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score51.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis cruxeval-o AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Codestral-22B currently leads CruxEval-O with 51.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What CruxEval-O measures and how its scores work.
CruxEval-O is a reasoning benchmark for predicting the output of Python functions from the function and its input.
It measures code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities using a Score reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about CruxEval-O.
Codestral-22B is currently ranked first with 51.30%.
The current leaders are Codestral-22B (51.30%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures code reasoning, understanding, and execution capabilities using a Score reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.