llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

CritPT Leaderboard

CritPT is a reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen for evaluating mathematical and critical problem-solving capability.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

CritPT Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelTEHy4 previewTencentScore16.90%Percentile100.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore16.70%Percentile80.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore11.40%Percentile60.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore8.30%Percentile40.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore6.00%Percentile20.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore3.10%Percentile0.00%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

CritPT Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

CritPT Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

CritPT

The Top AI Models for CritPT

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is CritPT?

What CritPT measures and how its scores work.

CritPT is a reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen.

It measures mathematical and critical problem-solving capability using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
CritPT
Modality
text
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about CritPT.

Which model scores highest on CritPT?

Hy4 preview is currently ranked first with 16.90%.

What are the top three models on CritPT?

The current leaders are Hy4 preview (16.90%), GLM-5.2 (16.70%), and Qwen3.7 Max (11.40%).

Which CritPT model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen3.7-Plus has the lowest matched official input price at $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among CritPT results?

The fastest matched records are GLM-5.2 (3.96 tok/s via ZAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does CritPT measure?

It measures mathematical and critical problem-solving capability using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Hy4 preview16.90%
Rank #2GLM-5.216.70%
Rank #3Qwen3.7 Max11.40%
Rank #4Inkling-Small8.30%

Ranking basisThis critpt AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    TE
    Hy4 previewTencent
    Score
    16.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CritPT, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ZA
    GLM-5.2Zhipu AI
    Score
    16.70%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 3.96 tok/s via ZAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CritPT, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    11.40%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CritPT, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TM
    Thinking Machines Lab
    Score
    8.30%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CritPT, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    6.00%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CritPT, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for CritPT

Hy4 preview currently leads CritPT with 16.90%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen3.7 Max
Inkling-Small
Qwen3.7-Plus
Benchmark rank #1Hy4 preview16.90%
Benchmark rank #2GLM-5.216.70% · $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen3.7 Max11.40% · $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens