creativity benchmark
Creative Writing v3 is an LLM-judged creative writing benchmark covering 32 writing prompts with 3 iterations per prompt.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score87.50% | Percentile100.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score86.50% | Percentile91.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score86.10% | Percentile83.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelXA | Score86.10% | Percentile75.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score85.70% | Percentile66.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score85.60% | Percentile58.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelXA | Score85.43% | Percentile50.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score85.30% | Percentile41.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAC | Score84.60% | Percentile33.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelAC | Score83.30% | Percentile25.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelAC | Score82.50% | Percentile16.67% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelAC | Score82.40% | Percentile8.33% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAC | Score76.10% | Percentile0.00% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What Creative Writing v3 measures and how its scores work.
Creative Writing v3 evaluates language models using a hybrid scoring system that combines rubric assessment with Elo ratings from pairwise comparisons.
It measures performance in creative writing areas including humor, romance, spatial awareness, unique perspectives, and emotional intelligence using the Score metric reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Creative Writing v3.
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is currently ranked first with 87.50%.
The current leaders are Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 (87.50%), Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (86.50%), and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 (86.10%).
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.50 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Grok-4.1 (100.00 tok/s via xAI), Grok-4.1 Thinking (80.00 tok/s via xAI), and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (8.77 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance in creative writing areas including humor, romance, spatial awareness, unique perspectives, and emotional intelligence using the Score metric reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis creative writing v3 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 currently leads Creative Writing v3 with 87.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.