llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

CLUEWSC Leaderboard

CLUEWSC is the Chinese version of the Winograd Schema Challenge and part of the CLUE benchmark, focusing on pronoun disambiguation and coreference resolution.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

CLUEWSC Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi-k1.5Moonshot AIScore91.40%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelDEDeepSeek-V3DeepSeekScore90.90%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelBAERNIE 4.5BaiduScore48.60%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

CLUEWSC Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

CLUEWSC Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

CLUEWSC

The Top AI Models for CLUEWSC

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is CLUEWSC?

What CLUEWSC measures and how its scores work.

CLUEWSC is a language benchmark with 1,244 training samples and 304 development samples extracted from contemporary Chinese literature.

It measures models' ability to determine which noun a pronoun refers to in a sentence, using the Score metric reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
CLUEWSC
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about CLUEWSC.

Which model scores highest on CLUEWSC?

Kimi-k1.5 is currently ranked first with 91.40%.

What are the top three models on CLUEWSC?

The current leaders are Kimi-k1.5 (91.40%), DeepSeek-V3 (90.90%), and ERNIE 4.5 (48.60%).

Which CLUEWSC model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among CLUEWSC results?

The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V3 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does CLUEWSC measure?

It measures models' ability to determine which noun a pronoun refers to in a sentence, using the Score metric reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Kimi-k1.591.40%
Rank #2DeepSeek-V390.90%
Rank #3ERNIE 4.548.60%

Ranking basisThis cluewsc AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi-k1.5Moonshot AI
    Score
    91.40%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CLUEWSC, not total model capability
  2. 02
    DE
    DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek
    Score
    90.90%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CLUEWSC, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BA
    Baidu
    Score
    48.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CLUEWSC, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for CLUEWSC

Kimi-k1.5 currently leads CLUEWSC with 91.40%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

ERNIE 4.5
Benchmark rank #1Kimi-k1.591.40%
Benchmark rank #2DeepSeek-V390.90% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek
Benchmark rank #3ERNIE 4.548.60%