healthcare benchmark
CheXpert CXR is a healthcare benchmark based on 224,316 chest radiographs from 65,240 patients for automated chest X-ray interpretation.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelGO | Score48.10% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis chexpert cxr AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MedGemma 4B IT currently leads CheXpert CXR with 48.10%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What CheXpert CXR measures and how its scores work.
CheXpert CXR is a benchmark dataset containing chest radiographs and uncertainty labels for 14 medical observations extracted from radiology reports.
It measures automated chest radiograph interpretation using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about CheXpert CXR.
MedGemma 4B IT is currently ranked first with 48.10%.
The current leaders are MedGemma 4B IT (48.10%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures automated chest radiograph interpretation using the Score metric, reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.