safety benchmark
CathedralBench is a third-party red-team cyber evaluation of highly difficult, multiple-exploit-chain tasks in egress-secure sandboxes.
Updated Sep 24, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXA | Score29.00% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis cathedralbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Grok 4.7 currently leads CathedralBench with 29.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What CathedralBench measures and how its scores work.
CathedralBench is a third-party red-team cyber evaluation focused on highly difficult, multiple-exploit-chain tasks in egress-secure sandboxes.
It reports Score as a ratio, with accuracy commonly reported on the hard subset of tasks in an unrestricted configuration.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about CathedralBench.
Grok 4.7 is currently ranked first with 29.00%.
The current leaders are Grok 4.7 (29.00%).
Grok 4.7 has the lowest matched official input price at $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are Grok 4.7 (5.32 tok/s via xAI).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It reports Score as a ratio, with accuracy commonly reported on the hard subset of tasks in an unrestricted configuration.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.