llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BrowseComp Long Context 128k Leaderboard

BrowseComp Long Context 128k is a benchmark for evaluating web browsing agents on 1,266 questions involving persistent internet navigation and hard-to-locate, entangled information.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

BrowseComp Long Context 128k Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore92.00%Percentile100.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIScore90.00%Percentile75.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.1 InstantOpenAIScore90.00%Percentile50.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.1 ThinkingOpenAIScore90.00%Percentile25.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore90.00%Percentile0.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

BrowseComp Long Context 128k Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

BrowseComp Long Context 128k Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BrowseComp Long Context 128k

The Top AI Models for BrowseComp Long Context 128k

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is BrowseComp Long Context 128k?

What BrowseComp Long Context 128k measures and how its scores work.

BrowseComp Long Context 128k is a reasoning benchmark comprising 1,266 questions with short, easily verifiable answers.

It measures web browsing agents' ability to persistently navigate the internet, use strategic reasoning and creative search, and interpret retrieved content, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BrowseComp Long Context 128k
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BrowseComp Long Context 128k.

Which model scores highest on BrowseComp Long Context 128k?

GPT-5.2 is currently ranked first with 92.00%.

What are the top three models on BrowseComp Long Context 128k?

The current leaders are GPT-5.2 (92.00%), GPT-5.1 (90.00%), and GPT-5.1 Instant (90.00%).

Which BrowseComp Long Context 128k model has the lowest official input price?

GPT-5.1 has the lowest matched official input price at $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among BrowseComp Long Context 128k results?

The fastest matched records are GPT-5.2 (100.00 tok/s via OpenAI), GPT-5.1 (100.00 tok/s via OpenAI), and GPT-5.1 Instant (100.00 tok/s via OpenAI).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does BrowseComp Long Context 128k measure?

It measures web browsing agents' ability to persistently navigate the internet, use strategic reasoning and creative search, and interpret retrieved content, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1GPT-5.292.00%
Rank #2GPT-5.190.00%
Rank #3GPT-5.1 Instant90.00%
Rank #4GPT-5.1 Thinking90.00%

Ranking basisThis browsecomp long context 128k AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-5.2OpenAI
    Score
    92.00%
    Price
    $1.8 input / $14 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp Long Context 128k, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.1OpenAI
    Score
    90.00%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp Long Context 128k, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    90.00%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp Long Context 128k, not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    90.00%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 80.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp Long Context 128k, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    OpenAI
    Score
    90.00%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BrowseComp Long Context 128k, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for BrowseComp Long Context 128k

GPT-5.2 currently leads BrowseComp Long Context 128k with 92.00%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

GPT-5.1 Instant
GPT-5.1 Thinking
GPT-5
Benchmark rank #1GPT-5.292.00% · $1.8 input / $14 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2GPT-5.190.00% · $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3GPT-5.1 Instant90.00% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via OpenAI