llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn Leaderboard

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn evaluates large language models on multi-turn and multi-step function calling scenarios.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMIMiniMax M2.5MiniMaxScore76.80%Percentile100.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelNVNemotron Nano 9B v2NVIDIAScore66.90%Percentile0.00%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1MiniMax M2.576.80%Rank #2Nemotron Nano 9B v266.90%

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn

The Top AI Models for BFCL_v3_MultiTurn

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is BFCL_v3_MultiTurn?

What BFCL_v3_MultiTurn measures and how its scores work.

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn is the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V3 MultiTurn benchmark, which evaluates function calling across sequential interactions and conversational turns.

It measures Score as a ratio by assessing sequential function calls, conversational context handling, dynamic function-use decisions, and the resulting state of API systems after function execution.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BFCL_v3_MultiTurn
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BFCL_v3_MultiTurn.

Which model scores highest on BFCL_v3_MultiTurn?

MiniMax M2.5 is currently ranked first with 76.80%.

What are the top three models on BFCL_v3_MultiTurn?

The current leaders are MiniMax M2.5 (76.80%) and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (66.90%).

Which BFCL_v3_MultiTurn model has the lowest official input price?

MiniMax M2.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among BFCL_v3_MultiTurn results?

The fastest matched records are MiniMax M2.5 (100.00 tok/s via MiniMax).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does BFCL_v3_MultiTurn measure?

It measures Score as a ratio by assessing sequential function calls, conversational context handling, dynamic function-use decisions, and the resulting state of API systems after function execution.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Ranking basisThis bfcl_v3_multiturn AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MI
    MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
    Score
    76.80%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via MiniMax

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL_v3_MultiTurn, not total model capability
  2. 02
    NV
    Nemotron Nano 9B v2NVIDIA
    Score
    66.90%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL_v3_MultiTurn, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for BFCL_v3_MultiTurn

MiniMax M2.5 currently leads BFCL_v3_MultiTurn with 76.80%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1MiniMax M2.576.80% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Nemotron Nano 9B v266.90%