llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BFCL v2 Leaderboard

BFCL v2 evaluates large language models on function calling using 2,251 question-function-answer pairs, including enterprise and OSS-contributed functions and multilingual prompts.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

BFCL v2 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMELlama 3.3 70B InstructMetaScore77.30%Percentile100.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelNVLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1NVIDIAScore74.10%Percentile75.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelNVLlama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1NVIDIAScore73.70%Percentile50.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelMELlama 3.2 3B InstructMetaScore67.00%Percentile25.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelNVLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1NVIDIAScore63.60%Percentile0.00%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

BFCL v2 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

BFCL v2 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BFCL v2

The Top AI Models for BFCL v2

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is BFCL v2?

What BFCL v2 measures and how its scores work.

BFCL v2 is a benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities across Python, Java, and JavaScript.

It measures AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection, with the metric reported as Score in ratio units.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BFCL v2
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BFCL v2.

Which model scores highest on BFCL v2?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 77.30%.

What are the top three models on BFCL v2?

The current leaders are Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (77.30%), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (74.10%), and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (73.70%).

Which BFCL v2 model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among BFCL v2 results?

The fastest matched records are Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (2,220.00 tok/s via Cerebras) and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (171.50 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does BFCL v2 measure?

It measures AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection, with the metric reported as Score in ratio units.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct77.30%
Rank #2Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v174.10%
Rank #3Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v173.70%
Rank #4Llama 3.2 3B Instruct67.00%

Ranking basisThis bfcl v2 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta
    Score
    77.30%
    Speed
    Up to 2,220.00 tok/s via Cerebras

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL v2, not total model capability
  2. 02
    NV
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1NVIDIA
    Score
    74.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL v2, not total model capability
  3. 03
    NV
    NVIDIA
    Score
    73.70%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL v2, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    Meta
    Score
    67.00%
    Speed
    Up to 171.50 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL v2, not total model capability
  5. 05
    NV
    NVIDIA
    Score
    63.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures BFCL v2, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for BFCL v2

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct currently leads BFCL v2 with 77.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Benchmark rank #1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct77.30% · Up to 2,220.00 tok/s via Cerebras
Benchmark rank #2Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v174.10%
Benchmark rank #3Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v173.70%