llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

ARC-E Leaderboard

ARC-E is the Easy Set subset of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge, consisting of grade-school-level multiple-choice science questions.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ARC-E Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOGemma 2 27BGoogleScore88.60%Percentile100.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemma 2 9BGoogleScore88.00%Percentile85.71%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelNRHermes 3 70BNous ResearchScore82.95%Percentile71.43%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemma 3n E4BGoogleScore81.60%Percentile57.14%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore81.60%Percentile42.86%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemma 3n E2BGoogleScore75.80%Percentile28.57%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)GoogleScore75.80%Percentile14.29%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank08ModelBAERNIE 4.5BaiduScore60.70%Percentile0.00%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

ARC-E Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

ARC-E Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ARC-E

The Top AI Models for ARC-E

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is ARC-E?

What ARC-E measures and how its scores work.

ARC-E is a subset of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge dataset containing questions that are more accessible than those in the Challenge Set.

It measures performance on multiple-choice science questions involving scientific reasoning and factual knowledge, reported as a Score ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ARC-E
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ARC-E.

Which model scores highest on ARC-E?

Gemma 2 27B is currently ranked first with 88.60%.

What are the top three models on ARC-E?

The current leaders are Gemma 2 27B (88.60%), Gemma 2 9B (88.00%), and Hermes 3 70B (82.95%).

Which ARC-E model has the lowest official input price?

No matched official input price is currently available.

Which models are fastest among ARC-E results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does ARC-E measure?

It measures performance on multiple-choice science questions involving scientific reasoning and factual knowledge, reported as a Score ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Gemma 2 27B88.60%
Rank #2Gemma 2 9B88.00%
Rank #3Hermes 3 70B82.95%
Rank #4Gemma 3n E4B81.60%

Ranking basisThis arc-e AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    Gemma 2 27BGoogle
    Score
    88.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-E, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemma 2 9BGoogle
    Score
    88.00%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-E, not total model capability
  3. 03
    NR
    Nous Research
    Score
    82.95%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-E, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Google
    Score
    81.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-E, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Google
    Score
    81.60%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ARC-E, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ARC-E

Gemma 2 27B currently leads ARC-E with 88.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Hermes 3 70B
Gemma 3n E4B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Benchmark rank #1Gemma 2 27B88.60%
Benchmark rank #2Gemma 2 9B88.00%
Benchmark rank #3Hermes 3 70B82.95%