language benchmark
AlignBench evaluates Chinese alignment of Large Language Models across eight categories using 683 real-scenario rooted queries with human-verified references.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score81.60% | Percentile100.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelDE | Score80.40% | Percentile66.67% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score73.30% | Percentile33.33% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score72.10% | Percentile0.00% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What AlignBench measures and how its scores work.
AlignBench is a benchmark for evaluating Chinese alignment of Large Language Models across Fundamental Language Ability, Advanced Chinese Understanding, Open-ended Questions, Writing Ability, Logical Reasoning, Mathematics, Task-oriented Role Play, and Professional Knowledge.
It measures performance in these eight categories using a rule-calibrated multi-dimensional LLM-as-Judge approach with Chain-of-Thought for evaluation.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about AlignBench.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 81.60%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (81.60%), DeepSeek-V2.5 (80.40%), and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (73.30%).
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.18 input / $0.70 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V2.5 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (10.00 tok/s via DeepInfra).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures performance in these eight categories using a rule-calibrated multi-dimensional LLM-as-Judge approach with Chain-of-Thought for evaluation.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis alignbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct currently leads AlignBench with 81.60%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.