llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

AITZ_EM Leaderboard

AITZ_EM is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating autonomous GUI agents on smartphones using 18,643 screen-action pairs from over 70 Android apps.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

AITZ_EM Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.20%Percentile100.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.10%Percentile50.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore81.90%Percentile0.00%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

AITZ_EM Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

AITZ_EM Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

AITZ_EM

The Top AI Models for AITZ_EM

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is AITZ_EM?

What AITZ_EM measures and how its scores work.

AITZ_EM is the Android-In-The-Zoo (AitZ) benchmark, with screen-action pairs and chain-of-action-thought annotations for natural language-triggered smartphone task completion.

It measures autonomous GUI-agent performance in smartphone task completion, including screen perception and action decision-making, using Score reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
AITZ_EM
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about AITZ_EM.

Which model scores highest on AITZ_EM?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 83.20%.

What are the top three models on AITZ_EM?

The current leaders are Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (83.20%), Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (83.10%), and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (81.90%).

Which AITZ_EM model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among AITZ_EM results?

No matched runtime record is currently available.

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does AITZ_EM measure?

It measures autonomous GUI-agent performance in smartphone task completion, including screen perception and action decision-making, using Score reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct83.20%
Rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct83.10%
Rank #3Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct81.90%

Ranking basisThis aitz_em AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    83.20%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AITZ_EM, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen2.5 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    83.10%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AITZ_EM, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    81.90%
    Price
    $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AITZ_EM, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for AITZ_EM

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct currently leads AITZ_EM with 83.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Benchmark rank #1Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct83.20%
Benchmark rank #2Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct83.10%
Benchmark rank #3Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct81.90% · $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens