multimodal benchmark
AITZ_EM is a multimodal benchmark for evaluating autonomous GUI agents on smartphones using 18,643 screen-action pairs from over 70 Android apps.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score83.20% | Percentile100.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score83.10% | Percentile50.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score81.90% | Percentile0.00% | Participants3 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What AITZ_EM measures and how its scores work.
AITZ_EM is the Android-In-The-Zoo (AitZ) benchmark, with screen-action pairs and chain-of-action-thought annotations for natural language-triggered smartphone task completion.
It measures autonomous GUI-agent performance in smartphone task completion, including screen perception and action decision-making, using Score reported as a ratio.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about AITZ_EM.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 83.20%.
The current leaders are Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (83.20%), Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (83.10%), and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (81.90%).
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.35 input / $1.1 output per 1M tokens.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures autonomous GUI-agent performance in smartphone task completion, including screen perception and action decision-making, using Score reported as a ratio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis aitz_em AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct currently leads AITZ_EM with 83.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.