llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1224 models729 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Aider Leaderboard

Aider is a code editing benchmark based on 133 Exercism Python exercises, with a Polyglot variant covering 225 exercises in C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Rust.

Updated Sep 5, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Aider Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelDEDeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeekScore72.20%Percentile100.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3 235B A22BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore61.80%Percentile66.67%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore55.60%Percentile33.33%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3 32BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore50.20%Percentile0.00%Participants4EvidenceCEvaluatedSep 8, 2026

Aider Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Aider Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Aider

The Top AI Models for Aider

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is Aider?

What Aider measures and how its scores work.

Aider evaluates AI models on translating natural language coding requests into executable code that passes unit tests, including editing existing code and formatting changes for automated saving to local files.

It measures end-to-end code editing capabilities and multilingual code editing performance; its metric is Score, reported as a ratio.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Aider
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Aider.

Which model scores highest on Aider?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is currently ranked first with 72.20%.

What are the top three models on Aider?

The current leaders are DeepSeek-V2.5 (72.20%), Qwen3 235B A22B (61.80%), and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct (55.60%).

Which Aider model has the lowest official input price?

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct has the lowest matched official input price at $0.14 input / $0.29 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among Aider results?

The fastest matched records are DeepSeek-V2.5 (100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek), Qwen3 32B (26.95 tok/s via DeepInfra), and Qwen3 235B A22B (21.74 tok/s via DeepInfra).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does Aider measure?

It measures end-to-end code editing capabilities and multilingual code editing performance; its metric is Score, reported as a ratio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1DeepSeek-V2.572.20%
Rank #2Qwen3 235B A22B61.80%
Rank #3Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct55.60%
Rank #4Qwen3 32B50.20%

Ranking basisThis aider AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    DE
    DeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeek
    Score
    72.20%
    Speed
    Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Aider, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3 235B A22BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    61.80%
    Price
    $0.70 input / $2.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 21.74 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Aider, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    55.60%
    Price
    $0.14 input / $0.29 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Aider, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    50.20%
    Price
    $0.70 input / $2.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 26.95 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Aider, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Aider

DeepSeek-V2.5 currently leads Aider with 72.20%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Qwen3 32B
Benchmark rank #1DeepSeek-V2.572.20% · Up to 100.00 tok/s via DeepSeek
Benchmark rank #2Qwen3 235B A22B61.80% · $0.70 input / $2.8 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct55.60% · $0.14 input / $0.29 output per 1M tokens