reasoning benchmark
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) is a dataset of 7,787 grade-school-level multiple-choice science questions covering biology, physics, earth science, and chemistry, divided into Challenge Set and Easy Set.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelOP | Score96.30% | Percentile100.00% | Participants1 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis ai2 reasoning challenge (arc) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
GPT-4 currently leads AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) with 96.30%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) measures and how its scores work.
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) is a reasoning benchmark dataset of multiple-choice science questions, with a supporting corpus of over 14 million science sentences.
It reports a Score metric in ratio units.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC).
GPT-4 is currently ranked first with 96.30%.
The current leaders are GPT-4 (96.30%).
GPT-4 has the lowest matched official input price at $30 input / $60 output per 1M tokens.
The fastest matched records are GPT-4 (104.00 tok/s via Azure).
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It reports a Score metric in ratio units.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.