reasoning benchmark
ACEBench evaluates Large Language Models' tool usage capabilities across Normal, Special, and Agent evaluation types, covering 4,538 APIs in 8 major domains and 68 sub-domains in English and Chinese.
Updated Sep 5, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score76.50% | Percentile100.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMA | Score76.50% | Percentile0.00% | Participants2 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
What ACEBench measures and how its scores work.
ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' tool usage across basic tool usage scenarios, ambiguous or incomplete instructions, and multi-agent interactions simulating real-world dialogues.
It measures tool usage capabilities with a Score reported as a ratio across 4,538 APIs in 8 major domains and 68 sub-domains, supporting English and Chinese.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about ACEBench.
Kimi K2 Instruct is currently ranked first with 76.50%.
The current leaders are Kimi K2 Instruct (76.50%) and Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 (76.50%).
No matched official input price is currently available.
No matched runtime record is currently available.
No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.
It measures tool usage capabilities with a Score reported as a ratio across 4,538 APIs in 8 major domains and 68 sub-domains, supporting English and Chinese.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.
Ranking basisThis acebench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Kimi K2 Instruct currently leads ACEBench with 76.50%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.