llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model Directory

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
1425 models809 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll Benchmarks
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

productivity benchmark

AA-Briefcase v1.1 Leaderboard

AA-Briefcase v1.1 is a productivity benchmark that evaluates multi-hour professional office work and reports Elo scores, separately from unversioned AA-Briefcase results.

Updated Nov 11, 2026

Models7
Model coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

AA-Briefcase v1.1 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

7 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicScore1,822.00 pointsPercentile100.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicScore1,811.00 pointsPercentile83.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Fable 5.2AnthropicScore1,785.00 pointsPercentile66.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank04ModelMAKimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AIScore1,678.00 pointsPercentile50.00%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank05ModelXAGrok 4.7xAIScore1,657.00 pointsPercentile33.33%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicScore1,578.00 pointsPercentile16.67%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedNov 10, 2026
Rank07ModelUPSolar Mini 4UpstageScore872.00 pointsPercentile0.00%Participants7EvidenceBEvaluatedNov 10, 2026

AA-Briefcase v1.1 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

AA-Briefcase v1.1 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

AA-Briefcase v1.1

The Top AI Models for AA-Briefcase v1.1

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

What is AA-Briefcase v1.1?

What AA-Briefcase v1.1 measures and how its scores work.

AA-Briefcase v1.1 is a benchmark for evaluating multi-hour professional office work.

It measures multi-hour professional office work and reports Elo scores in points.

Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
AA-Briefcase v1.1
Modality
text
Primary category
productivity
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
overall

LLM Stats. Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about AA-Briefcase v1.1.

Which model scores highest on AA-Briefcase v1.1?

Claude Opus 5.5 is currently ranked first with 1,822.00 points.

What are the top three models on AA-Briefcase v1.1?

The current leaders are Claude Opus 5.5 (1,822.00 points), Claude Sonnet 5.5 (1,811.00 points), and Claude Fable 5.2 (1,785.00 points).

Which AA-Briefcase v1.1 model has the lowest official input price?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lowest matched official input price at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Which models are fastest among AA-Briefcase v1.1 results?

The fastest matched records are Claude Sonnet 5.5 (42.00 tok/s via Anthropic).

Does the highest score result prove overall model quality?

No. This benchmark measures one defined capability or task. The overall LLMBoard score uses a separate aggregation across eligible benchmark evidence.

What does AA-Briefcase v1.1 measure?

It measures multi-hour professional office work and reports Elo scores in points.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

7 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rank #1Claude Opus 5.51,822.00 points
Rank #2Claude Sonnet 5.51,811.00 points
Rank #3Claude Fable 5.21,785.00 points
Rank #4Kimi K3.1 Pro1,678.00 points

Ranking basisThis aa-briefcase v1.1 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    1,822.00 points
    Price
    $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 7 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-Briefcase v1.1, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
    Score
    1,811.00 points
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42.00 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 7 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-Briefcase v1.1, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Anthropic
    Score
    1,785.00 points
    Price
    $8.0 input / $40 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 7 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-Briefcase v1.1, not total model capability
  4. 04
    MA
    Moonshot AI
    Score
    1,678.00 points
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 7 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-Briefcase v1.1, not total model capability
  5. 05
    XA
    xAI
    Score
    1,657.00 points
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 7 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures AA-Briefcase v1.1, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for AA-Briefcase v1.1

Claude Opus 5.5 currently leads AA-Briefcase v1.1 with 1,822.00 points. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price, and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Claude Fable 5.2
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Grok 4.7
Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 5.51,822.00 points · $4.0 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #2Claude Sonnet 5.51,811.00 points · $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
Benchmark rank #3Claude Fable 5.21,785.00 points · $8.0 input / $40 output per 1M tokens